VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XIX › Section 427
Chapter XIXwas s.234E

Section 427 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 427 — Fee for default in furnishing statements. Successor to s.234E of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 427 is in Chapter XIX — Collection and Recovery of Tax, which runs from section 390 to section 430.

← Section 426  ·  Section 428 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) imposes a fee of Rs. 200 for every day of continuing failure where a person does not deliver a statement as required by section 397(3)(b) within the prescribed time. Sub-section (2) limits that fee to the amount of tax deductible or collectible, and requires it to be paid before the statement is delivered. Sub-section (3) imposes a separate fee, also at Rs. 200 for every day the failure continues, on a person required to furnish a statement of financial transaction or reportable account under section 508(1) who fails to furnish it within the time prescribed under section 508(2), subject to a ceiling of Rs. 1,00,000. Both fees are expressed to be without prejudice to the other provisions of the Act.

Why it is there

The daily fee is a charge for late filing rather than a penalty for misconduct — there is no discretion and no requirement of default without reasonable cause — and making it payable before the statement can be delivered is what forces the statement in. The two ceilings keep the daily accrual within a fixed bound for each kind of statement.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Fee for late delivery of a deduction or collection statementRs. 200 for every day the failure continuesRuns from the expiry of the time prescribed in section 397(3)(b) for as long as the failure lasts427(1)
Ceiling on that feeThe amount of tax deductible or collectibleThe daily accrual stops at that amount, so the fee is bounded by the statement's own tax427(2)(a)
Fee for late furnishing of a statement of financial transaction or reportable accountRs. 200 for every day the failure continuesFor a failure to furnish within the time prescribed under section 508(2)427(3)
Ceiling on the statement of financial transaction feeRs. 1,00,000A flat cap, unrelated to any tax amount427(3)

What this means in practice

The fee accrues by the day and stops only when the statement is filed or the ceiling is reached, so the cost of delay is arithmetic rather than argument. For a deduction or collection statement, the fee has to be paid before the statement can be delivered — the return cannot be filed first and the fee settled later — and it is capped at the tax deductible or collectible in that statement, which means a small-value statement filed very late still carries a bounded fee. The statement of financial transaction fee under sub-section (3) is capped at a flat Rs. 1,00,000 instead. The opening words of both sub-sections preserve any other consequence under the Act, so paying the fee does not close off other provisions.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A deductor is forty days late in delivering a statement under section 397(3)(b) on which the tax deductible was Rs. 6,000. At Rs. 200 a day the fee would come to Rs. 8,000, but sub-section (2)(a) stops it at the amount of tax deductible — Rs. 6,000 — and sub-section (2)(b) requires that Rs. 6,000 to be paid before the statement can be delivered, so the fee comes first and the filing after. A person late with a statement of financial transaction or reportable account under section 508 is on a different track: the same Rs. 200 a day runs under sub-section (3), but the ceiling there is a flat Rs. 1,00,000 unrelated to any tax. Neither fee closes the matter, both sub-sections being expressed to operate without prejudice to the other provisions of the Act.

Where you meet this section

At the point of filing: the fee under sub-sections (1) and (2) has to be paid before the late statement under section 397(3)(b) can be delivered, so a deductor meets it while trying to file rather than in a later demand. The sub-section (3) fee reaches a reporting person separately, for late furnishing of the statement of financial transaction or reportable account required under section 508.

The words themselves

he shall be liable to pay by way of fee, a sum of Rs. 200 for every day for which such failure continues
Section 427(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See the circulars index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 427. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.