VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XVII › Section 322
Chapter XVIIwas s.178

Section 322 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 322 — Company in liquidation. Successor to s.178 of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 322 is in Chapter XVII — Special Provisions Relating to Certain Persons, which runs from section 302 to section 355.

← Section 321  ·  Section 323 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) requires every liquidator of a company being wound up, whether under the orders of a court or otherwise, and every person appointed receiver of any assets of a company, to give notice of his appointment to the Assessing Officer entitled to assess the company's income within thirty days of becoming such liquidator.

Sub-section (2) requires the Assessing Officer, after such inquiries or information as he deems fit, to notify the liquidator within three months from receipt of that notice of the amount which in his opinion would be sufficient to provide for tax then payable, or likely thereafter to become payable, by the company.

Sub-section (3) restrains the liquidator: until notified he may not part with any of the company's assets or the properties in his hands without the leave of the Principal Chief Commissioner, Chief Commissioner, Principal Commissioner or Commissioner; on being notified he must set aside an amount equal to the amount notified, and until he does so may not part with them. Sub-section (4) excepts three purposes — payment of the company's tax, payment to secured creditors whose debts have legal priority over Government debts on the date of liquidation, and such costs and expenses of the winding up as those authorities consider reasonable.

Sub-section (5) makes the liquidator personally liable for the tax the company would be liable to pay if he fails to give the notice, fails to set aside the amount, or parts with assets in contravention of sub-section (3). Sub-section (6) limits that liability to the amount notified where an amount has been notified. Sub-section (7) makes the obligations and liabilities joint and several where there is more than one liquidator. Sub-section (8) gives the section effect irrespective of anything to the contrary in any other law, except the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Why it is there

Once a company goes into liquidation its assets are distributed, and the revenue's claim can be defeated simply by the estate being paid out before the tax is quantified. The section makes the liquidator report his appointment, freezes distribution until an amount is fixed, and requires that amount to be set aside. Personal liability is what makes the requirement effective, and the cap keeps it proportionate where a figure has been stated.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Time to give notice of appointmentThirty daysAfter the person has become the liquidator or receiver; notice to the Assessing Officer entitled to assess the company's incomeSub-section (1)
Time for the Assessing Officer to notify the amountThree monthsFrom the date on which he receives notice of the appointmentSub-section (2)
Ceiling on the liquidator's personal liabilityThe amount notified under sub-section (2)Applies only where an amount has been notified; otherwise the liability is for the tax the company would be liable to paySub-section (6)

What this means in practice

Two clocks run from appointment: thirty days for the liquidator's notice, three months from receipt of it for the Assessing Officer's figure. Between appointment and notification the liquidator is frozen and needs leave to part with anything; after notification he may distribute only what remains once the notified amount is set aside, and only for the sub-section (4) purposes. The consequence of getting it wrong is personal, and its size depends on whether an amount was ever notified — so a liquidator who never gave the sub-section (1) notice, and therefore triggered no notification, has no cap to rely on. The override in sub-section (8) is wide but yields to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A liquidator appointed on 10 April gives notice on 5 May, inside the thirty days, and the Assessing Officer notifies Rs 2 crore within three months. He must set that Rs 2 crore aside before parting with anything else; if he distributes the estate and leaves nothing, he is personally liable, but capped at the Rs 2 crore notified. Had he never given the notice, no amount would have been notified and no cap would apply.

Where you meet this section

At the start of a winding up or receivership: the sub-section (1) notice to the Assessing Officer, his sub-section (2) notification of the amount to be set aside, and any application to the Principal Chief Commissioner, Chief Commissioner, Principal Commissioner or Commissioner for leave under sub-section (3)(a) or approval of winding-up costs under sub-section (4)(c).

The words themselves

shall, within thirty days after he has become such liquidator, give notice of his appointment as such to the Assessing Officer who is entitled to assess the income of the company
Section 322(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.
The provisions of this section shall have effect irrespective of anything to the contrary contained in any other law in force, except the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (31 of 2016)
Section 322(8), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Notifications that reach this section

A notification is made under a power the Act gives and, within that power, is law. These too were made under the 1961 Act and are placed here by the department’s concordance.

See the notifications index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 322. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.