VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XVII › Section 307
Chapter XVIIwas s.164

Section 307 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 307 — Charge of tax where share of beneficiaries unknown. Successor to s.164 of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 307 is in Chapter XVII — Special Provisions Relating to Certain Persons, which runs from section 302 to section 355.

← Section 306  ·  Section 308 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) charges income of the persons mentioned in section 303(1)(c) and (d) at the maximum marginal rate in either of two cases: where the income or part of it is not specifically receivable on behalf or for the benefit of any one person, or where the individual shares of the persons for whose benefit it is receivable are indeterminate or unknown.

Sub-section (2) brings that income back to the rate applicable to an association of persons, as if it were that association's total income, in four cases: clause (a), where no beneficiary has other income chargeable under the Act exceeding the maximum amount not chargeable to tax in the case of an association of persons and no beneficiary is a beneficiary under any other trust; clause (b), where the income is receivable under a trust declared by a person by will and that is the only trust so declared by him; clause (c), where it is receivable under a trust created before 1 March 1970 by a non-testamentary instrument and the Assessing Officer is satisfied, having regard to all circumstances existing at the relevant time, that it was created bona fide exclusively for the settlor's relatives, or the members of the family where the settlor is a Hindu undivided family, who were mainly dependent on the settlor for support and maintenance; and clause (d), where it is receivable by trustees on behalf of a provident, superannuation, gratuity, pension or other fund created bona fide by a person carrying on a business or profession exclusively for persons employed in it.

Sub-section (3), subject to sub-section (4), charges the maximum marginal rate where income of a person mentioned in section 303(1)(d) consists of or includes profits and gains of business. Sub-section (4) is the only exception: where those profits are receivable under a trust declared by will exclusively for a relative dependent on the settlor for support and maintenance, and that is the only trust so declared by him, association of persons rates apply.

Sub-section (5) supplies the deeming rules that decide most cases. Income is deemed not specifically receivable for any one person unless that person is expressly stated in the court's order, the instrument of trust or the wakf deed and identifiable as such on its date; shares are deemed indeterminate or unknown unless expressly stated there and ascertainable as such on that date.

Why it is there

Where a trust names no identified beneficiary or no stated share there is no personal rate structure to apply, and the arrangement could otherwise fragment income across unnamed hands. The section answers with the maximum marginal rate, and then restores ordinary association of persons rates in the narrow cases where the arrangement is plainly not a device — small beneficiaries, a sole will trust, an old dependent-family trust, or an employee benefit fund. Sub-section (5) makes the test documentary and fixes it at the date of the instrument, so indeterminacy cannot be cured afterwards.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Rate where the beneficiary or the share is not identifiedThe maximum marginal rate — the section states no percentageIncome of a person mentioned in section 303(1)(c) or (d) not specifically receivable for any one person, or whose individual shares are indeterminate or unknownSub-section (1)
Rate where an exception appliesThe rate applicable to an association of persons, as if the income were its total incomeAny of clauses (a) to (d) of sub-section (2); for business profits, only the will-trust case in sub-section (4)Sub-sections (2) and (4)
Ceiling on a beneficiary's other income for the clause (a) exceptionThe maximum amount not chargeable to tax in the case of an association of persons — the section states no amountNo beneficiary may exceed it, and no beneficiary may be a beneficiary under any other trustSub-section (2)(a)
Cut-off date for the non-testamentary family trust exceptionCreated before 1 March 1970By a non-testamentary instrument, with the Assessing Officer satisfied it was created bona fide exclusively for the settlor's relatives or the family's members, mainly dependent on him for support and maintenanceSub-section (2)(c)

What this means in practice

Everything turns on the four corners of the instrument as it stood on its own date. Sub-section (5) makes both tests documentary — the beneficiary expressly stated and identifiable, the shares expressly stated and ascertainable, on the date of the order, instrument or deed — so a later clarification does not help. Business profits are treated more harshly still: sub-section (3) charges the maximum marginal rate on them regardless of the sub-section (2) exceptions, and only the narrow will-trust case in sub-section (4) escapes. The exception in clause (2)(a) is the one most often claimed and the hardest to satisfy, because it fails if a single beneficiary is a beneficiary under any other trust.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A trust deed names a class of beneficiaries but does not state their individual shares, and the trustee receives Rs 30 lakh of interest income. Because the shares are not expressly stated and ascertainable on the date of the deed, sub-section (5)(b) deems them indeterminate and sub-section (1)(b) charges the whole Rs 30 lakh at the maximum marginal rate. Had every beneficiary's other income been within the maximum not chargeable to tax for an association of persons and none been a beneficiary under any other trust, clause (2)(a) would have brought the same income back to those rates. Had it been business profits, sub-section (3) would charge the maximum marginal rate regardless, unless sub-section (4) were made out.

Where you meet this section

In the return filed by a trustee, receiver or manager as a representative assessee, and in the assessment order applying the maximum marginal rate to trust income. The argument in practice is almost always about sub-section (5) — whether the deed states beneficiaries or shares that were identifiable or ascertainable on the date of the deed itself.

The words themselves

shall be chargeable to tax at the maximum marginal rate
Section 307(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.
shall be chargeable to tax at the rate applicable to an association of persons as if it were its total income
Section 307(2), Income-tax Act, 2025.
unless the individual shares of the persons on whose behalf or for whose benefit such income or such part thereof is receivable, are expressly stated in the order of the court or the instrument of trust or wakf deed and are ascertainable as such on the date of such order, instrument or deed
Section 307(5)(b), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See the circulars index.

Notifications that reach this section

A notification is made under a power the Act gives and, within that power, is law. These too were made under the 1961 Act and are placed here by the department’s concordance.

See the notifications index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 307. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.