VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XVII › Section 304
Chapter XVIIwas s.161, s.165, s.166, s.167

Section 304 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 304 — Liability of representative assessee. Successor to s.161, s.165, s.166, s.167 of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 304 is in Chapter XVII — Special Provisions Relating to Certain Persons, which runs from section 302 to section 355.

← Section 303  ·  Section 305 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) puts a representative assessee, as regards the income in respect of which he is a representative assessee, under the same duties, responsibilities and liabilities as if that income were his own beneficially. Two consequences are spelt out: he is liable to assessment in his own name, and any such assessment is deemed to be made upon him in his representative capacity only; and the tax on that income is, subject to the other provisions of the Chapter, levied upon and recovered from him in like manner and to the same extent as it would be leviable upon and recoverable from the person represented.

Sub-section (2) prevents a second assessment: a person assessable under this Chapter in the capacity of a representative assessee in respect of an income shall not, in respect of that income, be assessed under any other provision of the Act. Sub-section (3) preserves the direct route irrespective of the Chapter — the Assessing Officer may directly assess the person on whose behalf or for whose benefit the income is receivable, or recover the tax on that income from him.

Sub-section (4) deals with a trust only part of whose income is chargeable: the proportion of income receivable by a beneficiary from the trust that is derived from the chargeable part is determined from three quantities the sub-section defines — A, the chargeable part of the income of the trust; B, the whole income of the trust; and C, the income receivable by the beneficiary from the trust. Sub-section (5) gives the Assessing Officer the same remedies, in the same manner, against all property of any kind vested in or under the control or management of a representative assessee as he would have against the property of any person liable to pay tax, whether the demand is raised against the representative assessee or against the beneficiary direct.

Why it is there

Income often reaches its owner through someone else's hands, and the Act reaches it there. The section makes the person holding the income answerable exactly as the beneficiary would be, but confines the assessment to that income and to a representative capacity, so it is not an assessment of his own affairs. It then refuses to make the Department elect: sub-section (3) keeps the direct assessment of the beneficiary open, and sub-section (5) makes the property in the representative's hands answerable whichever way the demand is raised.

Who it applies to

What this means in practice

The assessment is in the representative's own name but sub-section (1)(a) deems it made upon him in his representative capacity only, so it is not an assessment of his beneficial income, and sub-section (2) bars a second assessment of the same income upon him under any other provision. That protection runs one way: sub-section (3) still allows the Assessing Officer to assess or recover from the beneficiary directly, so both routes exist and neither excludes the other. Sub-section (5) is where this bites in practice — the same remedies run against all property vested in or under the control or management of the representative assessee whichever of the two the demand was raised on. Where only part of a trust's income is chargeable, sub-section (4) does not give a rate or an amount; it fixes the three components from which the beneficiary's share derived from the chargeable part is determined.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A trustee receives income for a beneficiary. He is assessed in his own name, but the order records that it is in his representative capacity only, and the tax is levied on him to the same extent as it would have been on the beneficiary; the same income cannot then be assessed on him under any other provision. Suppose only part of the trust's income is chargeable — say 30 lakh rupees out of a whole income of 50 lakh — and the beneficiary is entitled to 10 lakh from the trust. Sub-section (4) makes the chargeable part, the whole income and the beneficiary's 10 lakh the components from which the beneficiary's share derived from the chargeable part is worked out. If the tax is not paid, sub-section (5) lets the Assessing Officer proceed against the trust property in the trustee's hands, and sub-section (3) separately allows the demand to be raised on the beneficiary.

Where you meet this section

In an assessment order framed in the name of a trustee, guardian or agent as representative assessee of another person, and in the recovery that follows against the property he holds. A beneficiary meets it when the Department raises the demand on him directly under sub-section (3) instead.

The words themselves

the representative assessee shall be liable to assessment in his own name in respect of that income and any such assessment shall be deemed to be made upon him in his representative capacity only
Section 304(1)(a), Income-tax Act, 2025.
the Assessing Officer may directly assess the person on whose behalf or for whose benefit income therein referred to is receivable, or may recover from such person the tax payable in respect of such income
Section 304(3), Income-tax Act, 2025.
whether the demand is raised against the representative assessee or against the beneficiary direct
Section 304(5), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See the circulars index.

Notifications that reach this section

A notification is made under a power the Act gives and, within that power, is law. These too were made under the 1961 Act and are placed here by the department’s concordance.

See the notifications index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 304. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.