VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter XVI › Section 292
Chapter XVIwas s.158BA

Section 292 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 292 — Assessment of total undisclosed income as a result of search. Successor to s.158BA of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 292 is in Chapter XVI — Procedure for Assessment, which runs from section 268 to section 301.

← Section 291  ·  Section 293 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) overrides the rest of the Act: where a search is initiated or a requisition made on or after the Act commences, the Assessing Officer must assess or reassess the total undisclosed income of the block period under this Part. Sub-section (2) abates ordinary assessment, reassessment and recomputation proceedings for any tax year in the block period that were pending on the date of the search or requisition, and also abates such proceedings for which a notice is issued between that date and the date of the order under section 294(1)(c), except for the year in which the last authorisation is executed. Sub-section (3) carries the abatement to a reference made under section 166(1) or an order under section 166(6). Sub-section (4) deals with a further search while a block assessment is pending — the pending assessment is completed first, the new one is made afterwards, and if less than three months remain the period is extended to three months from the end of the month in which the earlier assessment was completed. Sub-section (5) revives the abated proceedings from the date the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner receives an order annulling the block proceeding or assessment, with the revival ceasing if the annulment is itself set aside. Sub-section (6) keeps the ordinary income of the year of the last authorisation to be assessed separately, and sub-section (7) charges the total undisclosed income of the block period at the rate in section 192 irrespective of the years to which it relates.

Why it is there

It replaces year-by-year assessment with a single block assessment of undisclosed income after a search, and clears the field by abating whatever ordinary proceedings for those years were on foot. The revival rule in sub-section (5) makes sure that if the block assessment is annulled the abated proceedings are not simply lost.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Minimum time to make the assessment for a subsequent searchThree monthsWhere less than three months of the available period remain, the period is extended to three months from the end of the month in which the earlier pending assessment was completedSub-section (4)(c)
Rate on total undisclosed income of the block periodThe rate specified in section 192Charged as income of the block period irrespective of the tax year or years to which the income relatesSub-section (7)
Date from which abated proceedings reviveThe date of receipt of the annulment order by the Principal Commissioner or CommissionerRevival ceases if the annulment order is set asideSub-section (5)(a) and (b)

What this means in practice

Once a search or requisition happens, ordinary proceedings for the block period years stop by operation of law — you do not need an order to that effect, and a notice issued for such a year during the block window abates on the day it is issued. The undisclosed income of the whole block is taxed at the single section 192 rate rather than at the rates of the individual years, so the year the income belongs to no longer determines the rate. The one year kept out of the block machinery for ordinary income is the year in which the last authorisation is executed or requisition made — sub-section (6) has that income assessed separately in the normal way. If the block assessment is later annulled, the old proceedings come back to life from the date the Commissioner receives the annulment order.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A search is initiated on a person while a scrutiny assessment for one of the years falling in the block period is pending. Sub-section (2)(a) abates that pending proceeding on the date of initiation of the search, by operation of law and without any order being needed, and a notice issued for another block-period year before the order under section 294(1)(c) abates on the very day it is issued. What survives is a single block assessment of total undisclosed income, charged at the rate specified in section 192 as income of the block period — so if Rs. 6 crore of undisclosed income spans five years, the rates of those individual years no longer matter. Two things stay outside: the income other than undisclosed income of the year in which the last authorisation is executed is assessed separately under sub-section (6), and if the block assessment is annulled in appeal, the abated proceedings revive from the date the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner receives the annulment order — and cease to revive if that annulment is itself set aside.

Where you meet this section

In the block assessment order made under section 294(1)(c) following a search or requisition, and, before that, in the abrupt abatement of whatever assessment, reassessment or recomputation was already running for those years. The authorities named are the Assessing Officer, who makes the block assessment, and the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, on whose receipt of an annulment order abated proceedings revive.

The words themselves

The total undisclosed income relating to the block period, as referred to in section 293(7) shall be charged to tax at the rate specified in section 192 as income of the block period, irrespective of the tax year or years to which such income relates.
s.292(7), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 292. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.