VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter VIII › Section 125
Chapter VIIIwas s.80CCH

Section 125 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 125 — Deduction in respect of contribution to Agnipath Scheme. Successor to s.80CCH of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 125 is in Chapter VIII — Deductions to Be Made in Computing Total Income, which runs from section 122 to section 154.

← Section 124  ·  Section 126 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) allows an individual enrolled in the Agnipath Scheme who subscribes to the Agniveer Corpus Fund on or after 1 November 2022 a deduction, in computing total income, of the whole of the amount paid or deposited in his account in that Fund during the tax year. Sub-section (2) gives a separate deduction of the whole of any amount the Central Government contributes to his account in the same Fund.

Sub-section (3) defines the Agnipath Scheme by reference to letter No. 1(23)2022/D(Pay/Services) dated 29 December 2022 of the Ministry of Defence, and the Agniveer Corpus Fund as a fund holding the consolidated contributions of all Agniveers, the Central Government's matching contributions, and interest on both.

Why it is there

The Fund pools an Agniveer's own subscription with a matching contribution from the Central Government, and both would otherwise bear tax in his hands. The section removes that charge from both sides of the pool, and caps neither.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Deduction for the individual's own subscriptionThe whole of the amount paid or depositedPaid or deposited in his account in the Agniveer Corpus Fund during the tax year; no ceiling is statedSub-section (1)
Earliest subscription date that qualifiesOn or after 1 November 2022The individual must have subscribed to the Fund on or after that dateSub-section (1)
Deduction for the Central Government's contributionThe whole of the amount so contributedWhere the contribution is made to the assessee's account in the FundSub-section (2)

What this means in practice

There are two deductions, not one, and they are independent: the individual's own subscription under sub-section (1) and the Central Government's contribution under sub-section (2). Neither is capped, which is unusual for a Chapter VIII deduction. The interaction that decides the real case is with section 202 — under the default regime, section 202(2)(a)(xii) keeps section 125(2) alive but not section 125(1), so an Agniveer who has not opted out of the default rates loses the deduction for his own subscription while keeping the one for the Government's contribution.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

An Agniveer deposits Rs 90,000 into his Agniveer Corpus Fund account during the tax year and the Central Government contributes a matching Rs 90,000 to the same account. Sub-section (1) allows the whole Rs 90,000 he paid and sub-section (2) the whole Rs 90,000 contributed for him. If he is taxed under the default regime in section 202, only the sub-section (2) amount survives: section 202(2)(a)(xii) preserves section 125(2) alone out of Chapter VIII.

Where you meet this section

In the deduction schedule of the individual's return of income. The section names no form and no authority; the interaction that matters in practice is with the regime chosen under section 202.

The words themselves

shall be allowed a deduction in the computation of his total income, of the whole of the amount paid or deposited in his account in the said Fund during the tax year
Section 125(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.
"Agniveer Corpus Fund" means a fund in which consolidated contributions of all the Agniveers and matching contributions of the Central Government along with interest on both these contributions are held
Section 125(3)(b), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.