VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter VII › Section 120
Chapter VIIwas s.79A

Section 120 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 120 — No set off of losses against undisclosed income consequent to search, requisition and survey. Successor to s.79A of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 120 is in Chapter VII — Set Off or Carry Forward and Set Off of Losses, which runs from section 108 to section 121.

← Section 119  ·  Section 121 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) applies irrespective of anything contained in any other provision of the Act. No loss, whether brought forward or otherwise, and no unabsorbed depreciation, may be set off against undisclosed income which is included in the total income of any tax year consequent to a search conducted under section 247, a requisition made under section 248, or a survey conducted under section 253 — but a survey under section 253(4) is expressly excluded. Sub-section (2) gives "undisclosed income" for any tax year the meaning referred to in section 301.

Why it is there

If losses could absorb income unearthed in a search or a survey, a person caught with undisclosed income could end up paying nothing on it, and the detection machinery would carry no cost. The section removes set-off from that income alone. The carve-out for a section 253(4) survey keeps the bar away from the narrow verification visit directed at deduction and collection of tax at source, which is not an income-detection exercise.

Who it applies to

What this means in practice

The bar is absolute within its field: it overrides every other provision of the Act, and it covers current-year losses as well as brought-forward losses, since the words are "whether brought forward or otherwise", together with unabsorbed depreciation. But it attaches only to the undisclosed income component of the total income — losses may still be set off against the rest of that year's income in the ordinary way. Which receipts and claims count as undisclosed income is not settled here: sub-section (2) sends you to section 301, where the expression is defined to take in money, bullion, jewellery, virtual digital assets and other valuable articles, expenditure, and entries in books or transactions representing undisclosed income or property, as well as an expense, exemption, deduction or allowance claimed and found to be incorrect.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

An assessee carries forward a business loss of 80 lakh rupees. A search under section 247 leads to 1 crore rupees of undisclosed income being included in that year's total income, alongside 40 lakh rupees of ordinary business income. The 80 lakh may be set off against the 40 lakh of ordinary income, but not a rupee of it against the 1 crore — sub-section (1) forbids it, so tax falls on the whole of that 1 crore.

Where you meet this section

In the assessment order that follows a search, requisition or survey, where the Assessing Officer refuses the set-off, and in the computation filed for such a year — it is the provision cited against a return that has absorbed the addition with carried-forward losses.

The words themselves

any loss, whether brought forward or otherwise or unabsorbed depreciation, shall not be allowed to be set off against any undisclosed income which is included in the total income of any tax year
Section 120(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.
a survey conducted under section 253, not being a survey under section 253(4)
Section 120(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 120. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.