VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter VII › Section 111
Chapter VIIwas s.74

Section 111 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 111 — Carry forward and set off of loss from Capital gains. Successor to s.74 of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 111 is in Chapter VII — Set Off or Carry Forward and Set Off of Losses, which runs from section 108 to section 121.

← Section 110  ·  Section 112 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1)(a) takes a loss computed under the head "Capital gains" that could not be wholly set off against capital gains income under section 108 and carries it to the following tax year, where the set-off is split by the type of asset the loss came from: a loss on a short-term capital asset can be set off against income under the head "Capital gains" from any other capital asset, while a loss on a long-term capital asset can be set off only against capital gains from another long-term capital asset. Clause (b) carries any still-unabsorbed balance to the next tax year, and so on. Sub-section (2) caps the whole exercise at eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which the loss was first computed.

Why it is there

It keeps capital losses inside the capital gains head rather than letting them shelter other income, and preserves the long-term/short-term distinction on the way forward so that a long-term loss cannot be used against a short-term gain taxed differently. The eight-year cap puts an end date on the carry forward.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Maximum carry forward period for capital loss8 tax yearsCounted from the tax years immediately succeeding the tax year for which the loss was first computed111(2)

What this means in practice

A capital loss brought forward can only ever be used against capital gains — there is no route in this section to set it against business income, salary or other sources. Keep the short-term and long-term buckets separate in your records, because a brought-forward long-term loss is dead against a short-term gain, while a short-term loss is flexible within the head. The clock starts from the year the loss was first computed, so a loss computed in one tax year is available in the next eight and lapses after that.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A firm computes a long-term capital loss of Rs. 40 lakh in one tax year and has no capital gains that year, so section 108 absorbs nothing and the whole loss is carried forward. In the next year it makes a short-term capital gain of Rs. 30 lakh. It cannot set the brought-forward loss against that gain: sub-section (1)(a)(ii) allows a long-term loss only against capital gains on another long-term capital asset, so the Rs. 30 lakh is taxed in full and the Rs. 40 lakh travels on under clause (b). Had the original loss been on a short-term asset, clause (a)(i) would have allowed it against gains on any other capital asset — and either way sub-section (2) extinguishes whatever is left after the eighth tax year immediately succeeding the year for which the loss was first computed.

Where you meet this section

In the return of income, in the working of brought-forward and carried-forward losses, and in the intimation or assessment order that restricts the set-off — the usual disputes being a long-term loss claimed against a short-term gain, and a loss carried past the eighth year. No form or authority is named in the section; a loss reaches it only after section 108 has done what it can within the year.

The words themselves

if such loss relates to a long-term capital asset, it shall be set off only against the income under the head "Capital gains", if any, assessable for that tax year in respect of any other long-term capital asset
Section 111(1)(a)(ii), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Notifications that reach this section

A notification is made under a power the Act gives and, within that power, is law. These too were made under the 1961 Act and are placed here by the department’s concordance.

See the notifications index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 111. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.